Monday, September 1, 2008

On his seven-year quest and Marlowe's best-kept secret: a question for Samuel Blumenfeld, author of The Marlowe-Shakespeare Connection

Q: Sam, getting to the bottom of the Shakespeare authorship controversy is no small quest on your part.

Sam: Of course. In fact, J. Thomas Looney, in his 1920 book on the Earl of Oxford, makes several statements which express my own views on the quest to identify the true author of the works of Shakespeare:

"The transference of the honour of writing the immortal Shakespeare dramas from one man to another, if definitely effected, becomes not merely a national or contemporary event, but a world event of permanent importance, destined to leave a mark as enduring as human literature and the human race itself."

That is why I was willing to devote seven years of research to this project!

Looney states: "Everything seemed to point to his [Shakespeare's] being but a mask, behind which some great genius, for inscrutable reasons, had elected to work out his own destiny."

In addition, I'm always asked how Marlowe's fake death managed to be so well-kept a secret. Let me refer to Looney again, who makes an interesting point about secrecy in Elizabethan times:

"Mystery and concerted secrecy were moreover characteristic not only of the literary life of the times, but even more so of the general social and political life....We can be quite sure that in those times no important secret would be imparted to any one without first of all receiving the most solemn assurance that no risk of disclosure should be run....The carefully framed oaths by which Hamlet binds Horatio and Marcellus to secrecy, and the final caution he administers, is clearly the work of a man who knew how to ensure secrecy so far as it was humanly possible to do so. And we do know, as a matter of actual human experience, that when a superior intelligence is combined with what may be called a faculty for secrecy and a sound instinct in judging and choosing agents, secret purposes are carried through successfully in a way that is amazing and mystifying to simple minds."

It has taken 300 years to unravel this best-kept secret!

© The Marlowe-Shakespeare Connection, September 2008

Samuel Blumenfeld, a World War II veteran of the Italian campaign, has authored more than ten books. His latest, The Marlowe-Shakespeare Connection: A New Study of the Authorship Question, was published by McFarland. He is a former editor in the New York book publishing industry and has lectured widely. His writings have appeared in such diverse publications as Esquire, Reason, Education Digest, Vital Speeches of the Day, Boston, and many others. He is a regular contributor to MSC.

Click here for the blog's home page and recent content.

2 comments:

bb90 said...

good post; solving a mystery as timeless as the human race is certainly worth seven years.

i agree that secrecy is not only prevalent in the shakespeare plays, but also very effective. i think that in addition to secrecy in information, secrecy in identity is also relevant (in king lear, edgar as "poor tom," kent as caius. in hamlet, hamlet as a madman. and also maybe macbeth, with lady macbeth as the "innocent flower" with the "serpent under't.")

thom said...

Secrecy.

Absolutely, which is another reason (among John Hudson's many he offers) why a Bassano authorship is also compelling. A Venetian Jew educated in the Court, Bassano died in 1645, well before England's ban on Jewry was lifted.

Especially, in addition to escaping the noose for heresy, had there been truth to as Hudson supposes; a tryst between Marlowe-Bassano-Carey and/or W. Shakespeare. Apparently Amelia was not only quite beguiling musically, intellectually and physically, but also a woman unusually and passionately "liberated" for the time.

Curious as to your take on the concept of this woman being a serious candidate for authorship... Mr. Blumenfeld and/or Farey ? IMO Mr. Hudson makes as good or better case for Bassano's authorship as can be made for anyone else, including Marlowe.